That was rude behaviour, unbecoming toward a parliamentary colleague, especially a member of his own caucus. Nonetheless, the normally gentlemanly Justice Minister, Robert Nicholson, did not even wait for Woodworth to finish his press conference on the motion back in February before issuing a statement condemning it. It’s not a motion about a law, but only a study.
Player homes fallout new vegas code#
Section 223 of the code states that a “child becomes a human being” when it has completely proceeded, in a living state, from the body of its mother.” If Woodworth’s motion were to pass, a House committee would be charged with examining “what medical evidence exists to demonstrate that a child is or is not a human being before the moment of complete birth,” and the legal and legislative consequences of such a determination. Woodworth’s motion directs that a committee of the House be struck to examine the definition of a human being in the Criminal Code. Given that Stephen Harper is committed to maintaining the status quo, pro-life MPs must resort to nibbling around the edges of issues that perhaps, one day, under certain circumstances, might lead to questions being asked about why Canada has the most extreme abortion licence in the world, save for China, where abortions are sometimes compulsory. This week, Conservative backbench MP Stephen Woodworth has a private member’s motion coming up for debate in the House of Commons. This odd consensus produces odd behaviour. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.